Texas dept.: 2nd person tests positive for Ebola

BREAKING NEWS: Second healthcare worker tests positive for Ebola in Texas

    Worker cared for Thomas Eric Duncan at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital in Dallas
    Reported a fever yesterday and was immediately isolated at the hospital.
    Health officials interviewed patient to quickly identify potential exposures.
    Nurse Nina Pham is currently being treated for Ebola at the same hospital
    CDC has blamed 'breach in protocol' that lead Miss Pham to catch the virus.

A second healthcare worker at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital has tested positive for Ebola.
The worker was one of 76 medical staff who cared for Thomas Eric Duncan in Dallas, the first person to die from the deadly virus on U.S. soil.
The unnamed member of staff reported to Texas Presbyterian with a fever on Tuesday and was immediately isolated at the hospital.

Health officials have interviewed the latest patient to identify any contacts or potential exposures and have said that those people will be monitored.
Some 125 people are being monitored - 11 with definite exposure, 114 with possible exposure. 
The CDC said in a statement today: 'An additional health care worker testing positive for Ebola is a serious concern, and the CDC has already taken active steps to minimize the risk to health care workers and the patient.' 

Nurse Nina Pham, 26, was currently being treated for Ebola after becoming infected with the disease while caring for Mr Duncan at Texas Presbyterian.
Miss Pham, a Texas Christian University nursing school graduate, is in isolation at the same hospital. She was reported in good condition on Tuesday after receiving a blood transfusion from Ebola-survivor Dr Kent Brantly.

The nurse was reportedly in good spirits and had spoken to her mother via Skype.
The 26-year-old was one of a team of 76 medical staff who cared for Mr Duncan, 42, after he was diagnosed with the virus following his arrival in the U.S. from Liberia.

Despite wearing protective gear that included gowns, gloves, masks and face shields while caring for Mr Duncan, the nurse became the first person to contract the disease in the U.S.
Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) Dr Thomas Frieden has blamed a 'breach in protocol' of infection control lead Miss Pham to catch Ebola.

The newly-infected healthcare worker was part of the team treating Thomas Eric Duncan
The newly-infected healthcare worker was part of the team treating Thomas Eric Duncan

Mr Duncan arrived in Texas from Liberia on September 20. He began showing symptoms of Ebola three days after his arrival and was admitted to Texas Presbyterian Hospital on September 28. He died on October 8. Presbyterian's chief clinical officer, Dr Dan Varga, said all staff had followed CDC recommended precautions – 'gown, glove, mask and shield' – while treating Mr Duncan.

On Monday, the CDC said that a critical moment may have come when Miss Pham took off her equipment.

An immediate review has been launched into the procedures and equipment used by healthcare workers.

Dr Frieden added that the case 'substantially' changes how medical staff approach the control of the virus, adding that: 'We have to rethink how we address Ebola control, because even a single infection is unacceptable.' 

Ms Pham was diagnosed after admitting herself to hospital on Friday when her temperature spiked - one of the first symptoms of the deadly virus.  Her treatment has included a blood transfusion from recovered Ebola patient, Dr Kent Brantly, 33, and she is receiving experimental drug brincidofovir, or CMX001.

It was the third time Dr Brantly has donated blood to an Ebola victim after medics discovered he had the same blood type as previous patient Dr Nick Sacra and NBC cameraman Ashoka Mukpo, who is still being treated. 

Ebola, a hemorrhagic fever which has no proven cure, has killed more than 4,000 people in West Africa since an outbreak that began in March.
The World Health Organization has called the outbreak 'most severe acute health emergency in modern times'.

Read More >>

Boston University patent suit over Apple's iPhone 5 could net $75M

By Kevin Bostic
Apple's iPhone is at the center of another patent dispute, as the Trustees of Boston University have filed suit against the Cupertino company, alleging that not only the iPhone 5 but also the iPad and MacBook Air infringe on a BU professor's patent.
738

At issue in the suit is U.S. Patent No. 5,686,738, covering a method of "highly insulating monocrystalline gallium nitride thin films." Theodor D. Moustakas, Ph.D., a BU professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, is listed as the inventor of the '738 patent, and the University as the assignee owns the right, title, and interest to the patent.

The process in the patent is related to the production of semiconductor devices using silicon, sapphire, gallium aresenide, magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, and silicon carbide. Gallium nitride thin films, a product of the process, are desirable in electronics due to their being a source of inexpensive and compact solid-state blue lasers.

The plaintiffs claim that Apple's iPhone 5, iPad, and MacBook Air "include a gallium nitride thin film semiconductor device" of the type described in the '738 patent. The suit alleges that Apple "has infringed, and continues to infringe, one or more claims of the '738 patent."

BU's case would seem to be bolstered by the fact that at least one other company pays a licensing fee to use the component in question, the Boston Herald reported on Wednesday. The University will likely raise that issue in court.

Boston University has also filed identical claims against eight other smaller manufacturers, as well as claims against both Samsung and Amazon in the past year. Observers note that the payout from the Apple suit could top out around $75 million if the University can demonstrate that Moustakas intended to make a business out of his invention.

The University's suit calls for Apple to detail all "gains, profits, and advantages" stemming from its use of the '738 patent, as well as awarded damages to compensate for the infringement. The suit also calls for the court to permanently enjoin Apple from making and selling any of the infringing products.

In its filing, Boston University asks the court for a trial by jury on all matters suitable for trial by jury. The case, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-11575, was filed on July 2 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. F. Dennis Saylor is the presiding judge.

Read More >>

Questions for Google about Android security, Glass privacy




As European officials continue to voice concerns about privacy, surveillance, and Google’s products, researchers released a report this week on the security of the search engine company’s operating system:
Security researchers believe they have found a major security flaw in Google’s Android mobile operating system, which could affect up to 99 percent of Android phones now in consumers’ hands . . .

The problem lies in the security verification process that has been used on the Google Play applications store since the release of Android 1.6. It could leave up to 900 million devices open to hackers. The flaw, the research firm said, is a weakness in the way that Android applications verify changes to their code. The weakness would allow hackers to “turn any legitimate application into a malicious Trojan” without flagging the attention of Google’s app store, a mobile phone or the person using an application.

The result, researchers said, would be that anyone who breaks into an app this way would have access to the data that app collects and — if an app made by the device manufacturer gets exploited — could even “take over normal functioning of a phone.”. . .

Security is a common concern on Android phones, in part because the open nature of the system also means that it’s easy for anyone to find out how it works. Android is the OS of choice for 75 percent of the world’s smartphones, IDC reported in May. But a report released in March from the F-Secure security firm found that 79 percent of all mobile malware found in 2012 was running on Android phones.

This problem is exacerbated by the fact that so many smartphone manufacturers use their own versions of the Android operating system, making it more difficult to get system updates that may include security fixes out to customers. Hayley Tsukayama
On the same day that the report was released, a German official advised users to avoid certain companies, including Google, that share information with the U.S. government if they are concerned about eavesdropping:
NSA leaker Edward Snowden claimed Google, Facebook and Microsoft were among several Internet companies to give the U.S. National Security Agency access to their users’ data under a program known as PRISM. The companies have contested this, but the claims prompted outrage in Europe and calls for tighter international rules on data protection.

“Whoever fears their communication is being intercepted in any way should use services that don’t go through American servers,” German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich said.

He also said German officials are in touch with their U.S. counterparts “on all levels” and a delegation is scheduled to fly to Washington next week to discuss the claims that ordinary citizens — and even European diplomats — were being spied upon by the NSA. Associated Press
British regulators announced Thursday that they have asked Google to revise its privacy policy:
Google is facing more pressure in Europe as British regulators ordered the tech giant to make changes to its privacy policy in Europe by Sept. 20, following actions earlier this month from France and Spain. . .

The agency said that it was particularly concerned that Google’s policy, which went into effect in March and covers over 60 Google services, does not give users enough information about the data the firm collects and how it is used. It also has concerns that the policy does not share enough information about how long Google keeps user data.

If Google does not amend its policy, the British agency said, it will “leave the company open to the possibility of formal enforcement action.” The Guardian reported that the company could also face fines of up to $750,000, but only if there is proof that individuals may have been harmed by the policy.

Also on Thursday, the data protection office in Hamburg, Germany — where Google’s German office is based — said in a statement that it will be calling Google in for a hearing over concerns that the policy’s provisions on data collection are unclear.

Data protection officials from across the European Union have been scrutinizing Google’s privacy protections. The French data protection authority CNIL, which led a year-long investigation into Google’s privacy policy, and said in its order to the company in June that regulators in the Netherlands and Italy were assessing whether the policy violated data protection rules in those countries. Hayley Tsukayama
While European regulators have been more skeptical of Google’s policies than their counterparts in the United States, lawmakers in Congress have questioned Google about its new Glass headware:
On Monday, Google attempted to assure U.S. lawmakers that the headset, which mimics many of the functions of a smartphone, does not push the barriers of its privacy standards. But that was not enough to satisfy some lawmakers’ lingering concerns. . .

Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), co-chairman of the caucus, said that Google has failed to answer the key question: How can it ensure the privacy of passersby who have not agreed to be photographed or videotaped?

He said that there ought to be a way to alert individuals that they may be on camera and that there should be limits on the types of data that Google and other companies can collect from it, as well as limits on how long that data can be stored.

“There do not appear to me to be strong privacy protections for the population at large, or even ownership protection for the user of the Google Glass product,” Barton said. Hayley Tsukayama
Google has argued that it will be clear to people in the vicinity when the device is active or recording.

Read More >>

Hidden Google Glass code hints at 'Boutique' app store

As Google continues to shape its pre-release version of Google Glass, the latest firmware update has brought new features such a web browser - but it turns out that there are also a few other hints below the surface.
The most interesting new discovery lying dormant in the XE7 APK update code is a "Boutique" which hints at being a centralised app store.
Google Glass is currently lacking a go-to destination for applications, and the new discovery reveals that something is coming to fill that gap, well ahead of its consumer release.

Lock 'n' load

Another welcome new feature hinted at is a locking mechanism, which would function by the wearer swiping in a specific pattern.
This is something Google has mentioned in the past in response to questions over what happens when someone steals your Glass and suddenly has access to all your information.
Also buried in the code are some new media player functions, featuring playback controls, track information and some talk of a video player as well. Volume control has been officially added already, so everything seems to be coming together nicely.
There's no way of knowing when these new features will arrive, but the fact they're showing up in the coding now should mean that Google is busily working to get them out the door soon.
Check out a demo of the Google Glass XE7 web browser below.

Read More >>

Sources: Feds probe possible $90 million fraud tied to Bohemia firm



Federal law enforcement officials are investigating whether nearly $90 million in bank loans to a Bohemia finance company were the object of a "massive fraud," according to court records and sources familiar with the case.
The investigation involves Oak Rock Financial Llc, at 3900 Veterans Memorial Hwy., a commercial lending company that often provides capital that other lenders would then loan for transactions such as automobile and business-related purchases.

Last week, Israel Discount Bank of New York, the lead institution of the five banks that have loaned as much as $90 million to Oak Rock, asked a federal bankruptcy court judge in Central Islip to appoint a trustee to oversee the operation of the company on an emergency basis to preserve any of its remaining assets. The banks stated in court papers that Oak Rock falsified its financial position in order to borrow money.

Attorneys for Israel Discount Bank said in court papers that they had learned that the founder and head of Oak Rock, John P. Murphy, had resigned and can't be located -- and the manager who took over at Oak Rock estimated that the fraud went as high as $70 million.
"Oak Rock had perpetrated a massive fraud upon its senior secured lenders," the attorneys allege in the court papers.

As an example of the fraud allegation, the banks said in court filings that Oak Rock claimed recently to have $2.5 million in credit available when it actually was over-advanced by $47 million. The other banks that loaned the money to Oak Rock were identified as Bank Leumi USA, Capital One, Bank Hapoalim, and First National Bank of New York.

Lawyers for Oak Rock did not return telephone calls or emails seeking comment. Attorneys for the banks also declined to comment.

Murphy, who legal sources said had more than 20 years' experience in commercial lending, didn't return phone calls to his Nesconset home.

New chief discovers fraud
A longtime associate of Murphy's, Tom Stephens, took charge of Oak Rock, court papers said. Stephens later told the attorneys for the banks that on April 17 he discovered "that Murphy had been perpetrating a long-running, extensive fraud with Oak Rock by creating fictitious records," court papers said.
Murphy then resigned, the court papers said. According to state records, Oak Rock was incorporated in July 2001 as a Delaware corporation. The incorporation papers listed Murphy as president and said the company had four employees.

Further, Stephens said he informed the FBI and the U.S. attorney's office in the Eastern District of the situation at Oak Rock and they are investigating, the court papers said.
Sources confirmed the FBI's and U.S. attorney's inquiries into Oak Rock. Spokesmen for both the FBI and federal prosecutors declined to comment.

Stephens also said in light of the company's situation, "Oak Rock cannot possibly continue as a going concern and must be orderly liquidated," the papers said.
Two Oak Rock workers told Newsday that Stephens resigned Friday. Attempts to reach him were unsuccessful.

According to the court papers, Stephens began this past January to visit Oak Rock's offices to get a firsthand look at the company's operations and its books and records.
During the week of April 15 Stephens noticed unusual collection activity with respect to one of Oak Rock's customers and confronted Murphy, the court papers said. It was at that point, according to Stephens, that Murphy admitted to Stephens "that he had been creating fictitious records in order to increase Oak Rock's borrowing base," court papers alleged.

Though Stephens had told the banks about the problems at Oak Rock, the banks' attorneys now say they do not believe Stephens has the financial skills to operate Oak Rock and they want an experienced trustee appointed to oversee the firm, the court papers say.
A hearing on the banks' request for the trustee is scheduled for Monday in federal bankruptcy court in Central Islip.

The banks said in court papers that Stephens "has essentially hijacked" Oak Rock and accused him of denying the banks access to critical information about the company's financial health as well as failing to take steps to safeguard its assets.

Oak Rock specializes in a variety of businesses that involve credit -- in effect, borrowing money from banks and then loaning the money to other lenders or businesses or financing its own credit transactions.
The lending of money to other lenders or businesses is known as asset-based lending. Such loans can allow businesses to engage in installment financing for the purchase of consumer products or other business transactions, the court papers stated.

Oak Rock also had other companies participate in its loans to spread the risk, according to court papers and legal sources.

Marketplace impact
Jerome Reisman, a Garden City attorney who is representing AmeriMerchant LLC, a firm that borrowed from Oak Rock to advance to merchants, said the matter has the potential to dry up credit for some consumers and merchants.

"Right now it is catastrophic to the borrowers who can't draw down [from Oak Rock] on funding needs to fund their operations," Reisman said.

He explained that firms such as auto finance companies and merchants who let consumers make credit card purchases aren't able to fund their consumer accounts and commercial accounts.
"The end result is that [some] commercial and consumer funding has been cut off, pending a court hearing," Reisman said.

He declined to give specifics about AmeriMerchant's borrowing from Oak Rock, but stressed that the company had obtained alternate financing so it could pay off what it owed Oak Rock.
By noon Friday, an "administrative hold" on Oak Rock's operating bank account was lifted, court records stated.

With Chau Lam

Read More >>

Genpets, Real living Pre-packaged, Mass produced, Bioengineered pets!


Does anyone find this as disturbing as we do?

Are Genpets Real animals? How?
Genpets are living, breathing mammals. Bio-Genica is a Bioengineering Company that has combined, and modified existing DNA to create the Genpets lineup. Genpets have blood, bones, and muscle; they will bleed if you cut them, and die if mistreated just like any other animal. The electronic components are only in the packages and are for basic life support, outside of the packages the Genpets are wholly organic.

Genpets are packaged like toys though.
Genpets are designed to be sold on retail store shelves, not traditional pet stores. This is why they are packaged in plastic.

How are Genpets made?
The original prototype and breeding Genpets were created using a process called "Zygote Micro Injection" Thereafter the Genpets are grown in assisted breeding lab farms. Zygote Micro Injection is quickly becoming a favourable method to combine DNA, or to insert certain proteins from different species. Most notably it was used in 1997 to splice mice with bioluminescent jellyfish (link) and has since been used to create glowing rabbits, pigs, fish, and monkeys (link). Since then, human DNA has been injected into chimpanzees, spider into sheep, and now, Genpets have arrived.

Is bioengineering this far advanced?
In 2003 Human DNA was successfully combined with rabbit (and other animals), to create successful Chimera Hybrids. Read National Geographic for more information (link). While Bio-Gencia is still awaiting approval for worldwide distributionof the Genpets, Allerca already sells genetically altered cats.

How do Genpets stay alive in the packages?
While the Genpets™ hang on retail shelves they are in a chemically induced type of hibernation controlled by a protein in the packages’ nutrient supply tubes. This was a natural trait found in many seasonal animals that would normally hibernate in colder northern climates that has been added to the Genpet line. This also ensures comfort for the Genpets™ while they are on store shelves.

How do the Genpets breath in the packages?
There are vent holes on the side of the package that allow filtered air to pass.

Do Genpets feel pain?
Yes. However the Genpets have limited vocal chords so they will not create a large amount of noise when disturbed.

What if I go on vacation?
The same protein that keeps the Genpet dormant on store shelves can be supplied at anytime during the life span of the Genpet making care for the pet incredibly simple.

Do Genpets show emotions?
Yes. This is part of why we have colour coded the Genpets. They come in seven different personality types. Each personality type shows slightly different emotions.

Do Genpets Talk?
Genpets have limited vocal chords for the convenience of parents. However, they do make some sound.

Do Genpets grow?
Genpets come fully-grown in their packaging.


Where can I buy a Genpet?
We are currently getting the Genpets approved for resale, as well as securing retail opportunities. No public release date has yet been set.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More