President Obama's tax rate was 20.5%, lower than his secretary's

The White House says it underscores the argument for his 'Buffett rule' on taxing wealthier people.

Their tax form for 2011 shows that President Obama and his wife, Michelle, paid a 20.5% federal tax rate on $789,674 in adjusted gross income. (Daniel Acker, Bloomberg / April 13, 2012)

By Kathleen Hennessey and Michael A. Memoli, Washington Bureau

April 13, 2012, 4:50 p.m.
WASHINGTON — As President Obama mounts an aggressive campaign on what he calls tax fairness, his own tax burden has fallen to the lowest of his time in the White House, lower than many who make far less — including his secretary.

The president and first lady reported a joint adjusted gross income of $789,674 last year and paid $162,074 in federal taxes, or about 20.5%, according to the tax return released Friday by the White House. That income keeps the Obamas in the top 1% of taxpayers.

The Obamas' overall tax rate is slightly lower than the average for people in the top tier — largely because he made significant donations to charity. Data compiled by the Tax Policy Center show the average income tax rate for those making more than $532,000 is 24%. Obama's rate was closer to the average for household earning more than $210,000 — 19.2%

The Obamas' overall rate was still much higher than that of most middle-income Americans. Households making between $60,000 and $100,000 paid on average 8% of their income in federal incomes taxes, according to the Tax Policy Center. Polling consistently has shown that most people think they pay much more in income taxes than they do, in part because people focus on their marginal tax rate — the tax they pay on the last dollar they earn — not their average tax rate.

Obama's rate is also notably higher than the one paid by his presumed Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, a multimillionaire investor who paid about 14% of his income in federal income taxes last year, according to a summary of his tax return that he disclosed earlier this year.

But the Obamas' tax bite was slightly lower than the rate paid by the president's secretary, Anita Decker Breckenridge, who makes a $95,000 salary, the White House confirmed on Friday.

The White House would not disclose what Breckenridge paid, saying only that it was a "slightly higher rate" than her boss'. That "is exactly why we need to reform our tax code and ask the wealthiest to pay their fair share," said White House spokeswoman Amy Brundage.

The annual disclosure of the Obamas' taxes was punctuation to the president's call for the so-called Buffett rule, legislation named after Warren Buffett, the billionaire investor who famously complained that he paid a lower tax rate than his secretary. The Senate is due to vote next week on the rule, which would require those making more than $1 million to pay at least 30% in federal taxes. It is all but certain to be blocked by Senate Republicans.

The rule, however, would not have affected Obama's taxes had it been in place last year, because his income in 2011 fell below $1 million. The Obamas earned more in the previous few years —as much as $5.5 million in 2009 — because of sales of Obama's books.

Spokesman Jay Carney said that the president believed he should pay more in taxes and noted that he would pay more under other proposed policies, notably the administration's proposal to endPresident George W. Bush's tax cuts for couples earning more than $250,000. In 2003, before the second Bush tax cut, Obama paid about the same federal income tax rate as he did this year, even though his income this year was about three times as high.

The Obamas donated $172,130 to charities in 2011, or about 22% of their adjusted gross income. The largest beneficiary was the Fisher House Foundation, which received $117,130 — the after-tax proceeds of the president's children's book, "Of Thee I Sing: A Letter to My Daughters."

The Obama campaign used the returns to push Romney to disclose more of his financial records.

"Gov. Romney has yet to provide tax returns from the period in which he made hundreds of millions as a corporate buyout specialist, or as governor of Massachusetts, the experience he says qualifies him to be president," Obama campaign manager Jim Messina said in a statement. "Mitt Romney's defiance of decades of precedent set by presidential candidates on both sides of the aisle, including his own father, begs the question — what does he have to hide?"

Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul described the Obama campaign complaint as a "sideshow" and a distraction from the issues important to voters. Romney has released his 2010 return and an estimate of 2011 taxes, she said. Romney has filed for an extension of the deadline for his 2011 tax return, as he has done in past years, and will release it "sometime in the next six months and prior to the election," she said. "He will release his full 2011 return when it is filed."

Vice President Joe Biden and his wife, Jill, reported an adjusted gross income of $379,035, and they paid $87,900 in federal tax. The Bidens' tax burden, at 23%, was higher than the Obamas'. They donated $5,540 to charity.

kathleen.hennessey@latimes.com

michael.memoli@latimes.com

Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times


Tell Facebook: Withdraw Your Support For CISPA

What is Facebook thinking?  They've signed on in support of CISPA -- the new bill that would obliterate online privacy, give the military crazy new abilities to spy on the Internet, and potentially let ISPs block sites and cut off users accused of piracy.
First, please help push this viral on Facebook by using this link -- you'll be sharing the campaign, along with the photo of Mark Zuckerberg at right:
[fb] If you're already on Facebookclick here to share with your friends.
Then please sign add your name to our open letter.
---
The Center for Democracy and Technology says, "CISPA has a very broad, almost unlimited definition of the information that can be shared with government agencies and it supersedes all other privacy laws."
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation:
An ISP could even interpret this bill as allowing them to block accounts believed to be infringing, block access to websites like The Pirate Bay believed to carry infringing content, or take other measures provided they claimed it was motivated by cybersecurity concerns.
Internet users were able to push GoDaddy to withdraw its support of SOPA.  Now it's time to make sure Facebook knows we're furious.
First, please help push this viral on Facebook by using this link -- you'll be sharing the campaign, along with the photo of Mark Zuckerberg at right:
[fb] If you're already on Facebookclick here to share with your friends.
Then please sign on at right to add your name to our petition:
PETITION TO MARK ZUCKERBERG: What is Facebook thinking?  You're encouraging Congress to obliterate online privacy -- Even as your users express increasing concern about the privacy of their accounts on your site.  Please withdraw your support for CISPA right away.

Please add your name at right to sign our open letter to Facebook.

Here's CDT's resource page on CISPA.  Here's the EFF on IP implications.

Read More >>

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More